Papers with knowledge accuracy
Syntactically Diverse Adversarial Network for Knowledge-Grounded Conversation Generation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing conversation models produce meaningless and generic responses, which significantly reduce the user experience. |
| Approach: | They propose to fuse knowledge to improve informativeness and adopt latent variables to enhance the diversity of responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate syntactically diverse and knowledge-accurate responses while maintaining the knowledge accuracy. |
Crafting Customisable Characters with LLMs: A Persona-Driven Role-Playing Agent Framework (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Bohao Yang, Dong Liu, Chenghao Xiao, Kun Zhao, Chen Tang, Chao Li, Lin Yuan, Yang Guang, Chenghua Lin
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating human-like text, but the potential for freely customisable characters remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which employs Large Language Models to create freely customisable characters through personalised characteristic feature injection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides valuable insights for developing more accurate and customisable human simulacra. |
Model Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder Subspace Guided Projections (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing unlearning strategies lack interpretability or fail to provide robust defense against adversarial prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages SAE features to drive targeted updates in the model’s parameter space. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces harmful knowledge accuracy by 3.22% compared to baselines and improves adversarial robustness under jailbreak prompts. |
PrinciplismQA: A Philosophy-Grounded Approach to Assessing LLM-Human Clinical Medical Ethics Alignment (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack systematic approaches to integrate philosophical frameworks and expert validation for ethical reasoning assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a philosophy-grounded approach to assess medical ethics alignment . PrinciplismQA comprises 3,648 expert-validated questions spanning knowledge assessment and clinical reasoning . |
| Outcome: | PrinciplismQA provides a philosophy-grounded approach to assessing medical ethics alignment. |